Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
From MakeICT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→alternative layout of main page: new section) |
(→Organization Theory: new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Waiting for final release of new Web site, much of this would be duplicated. | Waiting for final release of new Web site, much of this would be duplicated. | ||
In my opinion the wiki format is best for answering questions and for reference information. | In my opinion the wiki format is best for answering questions and for reference information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Organization Theory == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have this strange idea to organize without regard to time. I feel as though information in a wiki should be sorted by relevance, and that relevance should be as timeless as humanly possible. A couple more {{dusty}} or {{abandoned}} templates would richly fill in readers about the project, while allowing it to be sorted without regard to time. Just a thought - [[User:Trysten|trysten]] ([[User talk:Trysten|talk]]) 17:50, 15 November 2017 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:50, 15 November 2017
ideas for Main_Page Layout/Structure
- Welcome -> emphasize and decorate
- General Information
- floormap of makerspace with links to area pages
- Administration -> Organization Structure? Operation of MakeICT?
- Collaborative Projects and Special Interest Groups -> needs to be a seperate page/category
- Classes and Hosted Events -> seperate page. event feed?
- Getting Started Using Our Wiki -> Want to contribute?
alternative layout of main page
Waiting for final release of new Web site, much of this would be duplicated. In my opinion the wiki format is best for answering questions and for reference information.
Organization Theory
I have this strange idea to organize without regard to time. I feel as though information in a wiki should be sorted by relevance, and that relevance should be as timeless as humanly possible. A couple more Template:Dusty or Template:Abandoned templates would richly fill in readers about the project, while allowing it to be sorted without regard to time. Just a thought - trysten (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2017 (CST)
